![]() As a consequence of this joint waste, minerals and other joint 'subject' plans no longer their own proposals maps but transpose their proposals onto constituent authorities maps. (the flipside of this is that development control only LPAs created under the Local Government, Planning and Land Act 1980 - UDCs - do not redefine LPA boundaries for plan making purposes, even if they cut across local authority boundaries, they have no plan making powers). Where there is a joint DPD then each LPAs proposals map must be updated, unless there is a joint planning committee under sections 29-31 of the 2004 Act which in effect redefines the local authority boundary for plan making purposes only. Proposals maps can no longer cross LPA (for plan making purposes) boundaries (the local authority area minus any national park, and the areas of whole national parks). This is only of practical consequence in one circumstance, joint development plans. There is only one significant change - under the old system you had one proposals map per development plan, under the new system you have one proposals map per LDF. In actual fact the legal status of and regulatory and policy statements on the contents of proposals maps are very nearly the same under the post 2004 system as previously. ![]() I hope this helps as there isn't much more guidance.ĭan First some boring legal stuff then the interesting artsy side. Upon adoption, the authority will need to consider how to illustrate the composite proposals map and whether any inset are required. To consolidated map which accompanied the submission of the Core Strategy last August also included details from the Minerals and Waste Plan. There is the further complication on PPS12 (paragraph 8.2) which also requires any relevant details of minerals and waste plans to be included on the same proposals map. The Council has produced a single composite proposals map showing the implications of these changes when viewed with the retained saved policies of the Local Plan. Through the submission Core Strategy, the Council is proposing a number of revisions to the Proposals Map (see ). This would imply that all notations have to be shown on one map. The authority is aware of the guidance in the 2004 LDF Regulations (Reg 14) which implies a single map with potentially a number of inset maps). Through the work on the Council's Core Strategy, the authority has considered the issues you raised.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |